Search

Showing posts with label Monday musings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Monday musings. Show all posts

Monday, 8 February 2010

Monday Musings

The Kat's wish everyone a very happy start the week and hope, if you are in London, are enjoying the snow!

The gloves are out for Aussie Olympic flag - The iconic Boxing Kangaroo flag (left) attracted controversy at the Winter Olympic Games Village in Vancouver over the weekend. The IOC believed that the flag, being flown by the Australian team in the Olympic Village, violated the IOC's rules on unauthorized commercial symbols being displayed at the Games. The flag is a registered trade mark of the Australian Olympic Committee used to promote sport. However, the Australian team has today won the right to keep its flag flying, after Australia's top Olympic official John Coats persuaded IOC president Jacque Rogge to allow it. For more information see this report in The Australian.

  • European ISPs Attack ACTA - This Kat is a bit late off the mark with this item but three months ago, back in November 2009, the European ISP Association (EuroISPA), the world's largest association of ISPs, issued a statement declaring that the "severe and wide-ranging" measures of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) could, in the words of EuroISPA President Malcom Hutty:
"create a serious danger of undermining and restricting the open innovative space that lies at the very heart of the Internet's success. This agreement would have a negative impact on Internet users without having an appreciable impact on fighting illicit use of copyrighted material."
The statement also suggested that ACTA's possible implementation of frameworks that provide for an ISP's liability in implementing "graduated response" measures against internet users has the potential of disrupting the balance that the E-Commerce Directive has endeavored to strike. EuroISPA also cited its concern for the secrecy of these negotiations stating that such measures are being attempted through a trade agreement which does not allow "various stakeholders, such as European citizens' representatives, to enter the debate." Three months on from EuroISPA's statement, not much progress has been achieved on the issues of transparency and wider stakeholder involvement.

Last week, Stanford McCoy, Assistant US Trade Representative for IP and Innovation, sent a letter to the Financial Times responding to their earlier article entitled "Secret deal aims to scuttle internet pirates" stating that the negotiations were far from secret and that
"governments participating in these negotiations have sought public comments, released a summary of issues under discussion, and enhanced public engagement."
In particular McCoy cited that the summary stated that ACTA is
"not intended to interfere with a signatory's ability to respect its citizens' fundamental rights and civil liberties."
As someone once said, "the road to hell is paved with good intentions"....For more information please see the AmeriKat's previous articles here and here.

  • Out of le bleu! - Given France's outspoken opposition of the Google Book Settlement, a French-Google partnership would have seemed unlikely (see IPKat post here).However, such a pairing may be blossoming this week with reports of a partnership between Google and Lyon Library. The contract would see Google digitizing the Library's works for free in exchange for a commercial licence to use the digitized documents for the next 25 years. Frederic Mitterand, the French minister of culture, was reported by Le Monde in January as saying that Google had come to France with "the attitude of a conqueror" but hoped that France and Google move toward a more collegiate relationship (image: has Google's power towered over France yet?) Readers may recall that in January, France gave Google an ultimatum to drop their commercial exclusivity clauses contained in their digitization contracts or face the government ejecting them from their project with the National Library of France.

Sunday, 12 July 2009

Monday musings

This Tuesday 14 July, from 5.30pm to 7pm, Australian practitioner Julian Gyngell will be addressing an informal meeting of the IP Finance blog group on the subject "Phonewords and Finance". McDermott Will & Emery have kindly agreed to provide a venue in their City office at 7 Bishopsgate (here).

Several people have told IPKat team member Jeremy that they plan to attend this pleasant and informative event, for which admission is free, but he has yet to receive their confirmation. If you are coming, please email Jeremy here, today if possible, and let him know so he'll know how many chairs to put out etc etc ...


Every so often the IPKat gets asked about all those images he uses. Are they really copyright-free? No, they're not -- but some are supplied by readers (quite a lot of the cat-pictures fit into this category), others are (i) definitely out of copyright, (ii) probably out of copyright, (iii) taken by the IPKat himself, (iv) dug up from Creative Commons or similar licensed sources or (v) used on the assumption that they fall within fair use/fair dealing/ transformative use or other defences of varying degrees of reliability.

Above, left: this charming little fellow is just nuts about Creative Commons, which has licensed his transmission on this blog

But from now his task gets easier, since --thanks to his good friend Hugo Cox -- he has discovered a handy Google Image Search device that helps him root out images with Creative Commons or other tagged licence terms, as well as works in the public domain. You can read all about it on the Google Blog here.


When intellectual property academics and practitioners involved with learning and teaching get asked to teach 'some' intellectual property to students on programmes located in faculties other than law, the IP content is often part of a wider 'business law' unit.

Right: it's really cool to study IP-flavoured Business Law

If the students have already invested in a standard generic Business Law book, the odds are it will contain no mention of IP. This omission sends out a subliminal message that IP law isn't 'business law'. The IPKat's good friend Professor Ruth Soetendorp writes to the readers of this weblog:
"Your answers to the following questions (and comments) would be most welcome:

1. Should generic Business Law student texts include material on IP?

1a. If yes, what would an IP chapter cover?

2. Do you teach IP to students in faculties other than law?

2a. If yes, which faculties?"
Please email Ruth (and not the poor Kat!) here

Followers